首页> 外文OA文献 >On the Effective Measure of Dimension in the Analysis Cosparse Model
【2h】

On the Effective Measure of Dimension in the Analysis Cosparse Model

机译:分析Cosparse模型中维数的有效度量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Many applications have benefited remarkably from low-dimensional models inthe recent decade. The fact that many signals, though high dimensional, areintrinsically low dimensional has given the possibility to recover them stablyfrom a relatively small number of their measurements. For example, incompressed sensing with the standard (synthesis) sparsity prior and in matrixcompletion, the number of measurements needed is proportional (up to alogarithmic factor) to the signal's manifold dimension. Recently, a new natural low-dimensional signal model has been proposed: thecosparse analysis prior. In the noiseless case, it is possible to recoversignals from this model, using a combinatorial search, from a number ofmeasurements proportional to the signal's manifold dimension. However, if weask for stability to noise or an efficient (polynomial complexity) solver, allthe existing results demand a number of measurements which is far removed fromthe manifold dimension, sometimes far greater. Thus, it is natural to askwhether this gap is a deficiency of the theory and the solvers, or if thereexists a real barrier in recovering the cosparse signals by relying only ontheir manifold dimension. Is there an algorithm which, in the presence ofnoise, can accurately recover a cosparse signal from a number of measurementsproportional to the manifold dimension? In this work, we prove that there is nosuch algorithm. Further, we show through numerical simulations that even in thenoiseless case convex relaxations fail when the number of measurements iscomparable to the manifold dimension. This gives a practical counter-example tothe growing literature on compressed acquisition of signals based on manifolddimension.
机译:近十年来,许多应用程序都从低维模型中受益匪浅。许多信号尽管是高维的,但本质上是低维的,这使得从相对较少的测量结果中稳定地恢复它们成为可能。例如,在矩阵完成之前和矩阵完成中具有标准(综合)稀疏性的压缩感知中,所需的测量次数与信号的流形尺寸成比例(最大为对数因子)。最近,已经提出了一种新的自然的低维信号模型:先进行稀疏分析。在无噪声的情况下,可以使用组合搜索从与信号的流形尺寸成比例的多个测量值中,从该模型中恢复信号。但是,如果减弱噪声的稳定性或使用有效的(多项式复杂性)求解器,则所有现有结果都需要进行大量测量,这些测量值与流形尺寸相去甚远,有时甚至更大。因此,很自然地会问这个间隙是否是理论和解算器的不足,或者是否仅依靠流形的维数来恢复粗疏信号时是否存在真正的障碍。是否存在一种算法,在存在噪声的情况下,可以从与歧管尺寸成比例的多个测量中准确地恢复出稀疏信号?在这项工作中,我们证明没有这种算法。此外,我们通过数值模拟表明,即使在无噪声的情况下,当测量数量可与歧管尺寸相比时,凸弛豫也会失败。这为不断增长的有关基于流形尺寸的信号压缩采集的文献提供了实际的反例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号